Athanasius proved to be a key spokesperson at the First Council of Nicaea, where the Church officials wrote down the original versionof the Nicene Creed, and is considered a Doctor of the Church in the Roman Catholic Church. He is well known for his defending the Church against Arianism.
Within the chapters 1-3 Athanasius eludes greatly to theidea of the divinity of Jesus. One could even say that he is the light within the darkness. The darkness is that found in the hedonism of humanity and He is there to be the guiding light to bring all back to His flock. In addition, Athanasius also noted the great detail of the saving actions of Christ not only in his eventual death and resurrection but also his connection to God’s will through the Word that came to be the foundation of creation.
In section 8, Athanasius states that “No part of creation had ever been without Him Who, while ever abiding in union with the Father, yet fills all things that are. But now He entered the world in a new way.” Do you think that this is evident of Deist, Interventionist, or Sustained Creation. Please explain.
In section 16, Athanasius says, “the Word submitted to appear in a body in order that he as man might center their senses on himself and convince them through his human acts that He himself is not man only, but also God” From this quote, do you think Athanasius views Jesus from a Gnostic perspective, or is he fighting against the Gnostic perspective? If he is arguing from a Gnostic perspective, how does that affect his view of the Incarnation?
In section 17, Athanasius says, “The Word was not hedged in by his body, nor did his presence in the body prevent his being present elsewhere as well. When he moved His body He did not cease also to direct theuniverse by His mind and might. No.” In your opinion, is this view compatible with the idea of the Incarnation according to the Church?
Posted by: Mary Cieslak, Brooks Reagan, Brendan Zaleski